DFAU vs. CGDV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV).

DFAU and CGDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFAU is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 17, 2020. CGDV is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.

Performance

DFAU vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFAU vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	-2.67%	16.78%	23.17%	24.79%	-8.47%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	-1.69%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's -1.69% return.

DFAU

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: -2.67%
• 6M: -0.51%
• 1Y: 19.02%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 11.15%
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: -1.69%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAU vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

CGDV

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF

DFAU

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

Return for Risk

DFAU vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAU

DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 61
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 73
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAU vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFAU	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.28	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.86	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.29	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	1.99	-0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.42	8.44	-1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFAU vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAU and CGDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFAU	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	1.28	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	1.05	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between DFAU and CGDV is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DFAU vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than CGDV's 1.33% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	1.03%	0.95%	1.10%	1.29%	1.40%	1.00%	0.13%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.33%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DFAU vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAU	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-21.82%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.45%	-10.91%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.36%	-6.61%	+1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-3.72%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	2.57%	+0.05%

Volatility

DFAU vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) have volatilities of 5.39% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAU	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	5.55%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.67%	9.27%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.52%	16.76%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	15.61%	+1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.87%	15.61%	+1.26%