DFAU vs. BUFX
DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
DFAU vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.14% return.
DFAU
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 30.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 12.07% | 13.11% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.14% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAU and BUFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAU vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
DFAU
BUFX
DFAU vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 2.70 | -1.75 |
Drawdowns
DFAU vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -2.87% | -20.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -0.24% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | — | — |
Volatility
DFAU vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 3.99% | +8.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 3.99% | +13.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 3.99% | +12.75% |
DFAU vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAU vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.89% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAU and BUFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
DFAU has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
DFAU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for DFAU and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer