PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAT vs. OMFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFAT vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFAT vs. OMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAT
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
5.24%8.73%7.80%20.86%-6.23%5.08%
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
2.13%13.34%3.98%15.12%-17.29%1.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAT achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly higher than OMFS's 2.13% return.


DFAT

1D
2.01%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
5.24%
6M
8.08%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
10Y*

OMFS

1D
2.76%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
2.13%
6M
3.49%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFAT vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DFAT vs. OMFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAT
DFAT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DFAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

OMFS
OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAT vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFATOMFSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

0.96

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

1.48

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.80

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.87

6.67

-0.80

DFAT vs. OMFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the OMFS Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAT and OMFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFATOMFSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

0.96

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.36

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between DFAT and OMFS is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFAT vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison

DFAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than OMFS's 1.02% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFAT
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
1.56%1.55%1.31%1.34%1.34%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
1.02%0.80%1.87%1.27%1.84%0.66%1.07%1.29%1.50%0.34%

Drawdowns

DFAT vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAT drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum OMFS drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAT and OMFS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFATOMFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

-42.50%

+16.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.60%

-12.23%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.07%

-6.39%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.42%

-10.68%

+4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.29%

+0.70%

Volatility

DFAT vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) is 5.24%, while Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that DFAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFATOMFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

6.48%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

13.57%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.40%

21.35%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.72%

21.61%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.72%

24.45%

-2.73%