PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAPX vs. FIKQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAPX vs. FIKQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAPX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than FIKQX's 0.10% return.


DFAPX

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.65%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
1.95%

FIKQX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.43%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAPX vs. FIKQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DFAPX
DFA Investment Grade Portfolio
0.55%7.22%1.81%6.84%-12.92%-1.57%9.19%9.97%1.98%
FIKQX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z
0.10%7.31%1.69%6.75%-13.97%-1.03%10.00%9.90%2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAPX and FIKQX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.92

The correlation between DFAPX and FIKQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAPX vs. FIKQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAPX
DFAPX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DFAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKQX
FIKQX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FIKQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAPX vs. FIKQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAPXFIKQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.39

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

3.94

+0.73

DFAPX vs. FIKQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the FIKQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAPX and FIKQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAPX vs. FIKQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAPX drawdown since its inception was -18.30%, roughly equal to the maximum FIKQX drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAPX and FIKQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAPXFIKQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.30%

-18.53%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-3.13%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

-6.05%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-18.53%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.85%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-5.19%

+1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.11%

-0.14%

Volatility

DFAPX vs. FIKQX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) have volatilities of 1.11% and 1.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAPXFIKQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

1.08%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

2.81%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

3.87%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.82%

6.00%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

5.48%

-0.59%

DFAPX vs. FIKQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAPX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FIKQX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAPX vs. FIKQX - Dividend Comparison

DFAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than FIKQX's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAPX
DFA Investment Grade Portfolio
3.74%3.78%3.79%3.31%2.62%3.31%2.14%2.59%2.67%2.21%2.12%2.45%
FIKQX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z
4.02%3.97%4.08%3.65%2.05%1.44%4.90%2.83%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAPX and FIKQX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAPX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to FIKQX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAPX dropped -18.30% vs FIKQX's -18.53%.

DFAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAPX and FIKQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer