FIKQX vs. FXAIX
FIKQX (Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z) and FXAIX (Fidelity 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FIKQX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FXAIX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, FIKQX returned 0.18%/yr vs 14.10%/yr for FXAIX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIKQX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FXAIX.
Performance
FIKQX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKQX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 10.19% return.
FIKQX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
FXAIX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 27.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 14.10%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
FIKQX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 0.38% | 7.31% | 1.69% | 6.75% | -13.97% | -1.03% | 10.00% | 9.90% | 2.01% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 10.19% | 17.84% | 25.01% | 26.29% | -18.14% | 28.71% | 18.42% | 31.48% | -10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKQX and FXAIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, FIKQX and FXAIX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKQX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKQX
FXAIX
FIKQX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIKQX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.39 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 3.04 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.23 | 13.75 | -9.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIKQX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKQX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKQX and FXAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKQX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -33.79% | +15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -8.89% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.05% | -18.76% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -24.50% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -1.36% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -3.79% | -1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 1.96% | -0.86% |
Volatility
FIKQX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) is 1.15%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that FIKQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKQX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 4.77% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.80% | 9.91% | -7.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 12.47% | -8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 17.01% | -11.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 18.11% | -12.63% |
FIKQX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKQX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKQX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
FIKQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than FXAIX's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 4.01% | 3.97% | 4.08% | 3.65% | 2.05% | 1.44% | 4.90% | 2.83% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.04% | 1.11% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIKQX and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXAIX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to FIKQX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKQX dropped -18.53% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.
FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKQX and FXAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer