FIKQX vs. FTHRX
FIKQX (Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z) and FTHRX (Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FIKQX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FTHRX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FIKQX returned 0.19%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FTHRX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIKQX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTHRX.
Performance
FIKQX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKQX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's -0.24% return.
FIKQX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- —
FTHRX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
FIKQX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 0.10% | 7.31% | 1.69% | 6.75% | -13.97% | -1.03% | 10.00% | 9.90% | 2.01% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.24% | 6.89% | 3.25% | 5.55% | -9.17% | -1.60% | 7.06% | 7.20% | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKQX and FTHRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FIKQX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKQX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKQX
FTHRX
FIKQX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIKQX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.59 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 4.39 | -0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIKQX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKQX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, roughly equal to the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKQX and FTHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKQX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -19.01% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -2.11% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.05% | -2.68% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -13.18% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -1.48% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -3.06% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 0.76% | +0.35% |
Volatility
FIKQX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.87%. This indicates that FIKQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKQX | FTHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 0.87% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 2.09% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 2.80% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 4.04% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 3.40% | +2.08% |
FIKQX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKQX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKQX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison
FIKQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than FTHRX's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 4.02% | 3.97% | 4.08% | 3.65% | 2.05% | 1.44% | 4.90% | 2.83% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.71% | 3.59% | 3.49% | 2.94% | 1.55% | 1.53% | 4.16% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 2.20% | 2.63% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FIKQX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIKQX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to FTHRX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKQX dropped -18.53% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.
FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKQX and FTHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer