PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAPX vs. BIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAPX vs. BIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAPX achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, DFAPX has outperformed BIV with an annualized return of 2.02%, while BIV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.82% annualized return.


DFAPX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.89%
YTD
0.84%
6M
0.94%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
2.02%

BIV

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAPX vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFAPX
DFA Investment Grade Portfolio
0.84%7.22%1.81%6.84%-12.92%-1.57%9.19%9.97%-0.24%3.37%
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.24%8.52%1.57%6.07%-13.21%-2.40%9.67%10.34%-0.19%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAPX and BIV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.94

The correlation between DFAPX and BIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAPX vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAPX
DFAPX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DFAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAPX vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAPXBIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.17

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.28

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

3.59

+1.52

DFAPX vs. BIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the BIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAPX and BIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAPX vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAPX drawdown since its inception was -18.30%, roughly equal to the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAPX and BIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAPXBIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.30%

-18.95%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-3.18%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

-6.07%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-18.74%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.30%

-18.95%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-2.04%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-3.38%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.13%

-0.16%

Volatility

DFAPX vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) is 1.14%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that DFAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAPXBIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.22%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

3.03%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84%

4.04%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.82%

6.40%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

5.51%

-0.62%

DFAPX vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAPX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAPX vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison

DFAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than BIV's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.22%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
DFAPX
DFA Investment Grade Portfolio
3.73%3.78%3.79%3.31%2.62%3.31%2.14%2.59%2.67%2.21%2.12%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DFAPX and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BIV has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to DFAPX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAPX dropped -18.30% vs BIV's -18.95%.

DFAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAPX and BIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer