Correlation
The correlation between DFAPX and DGSFX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
DFAPX vs. DGSFX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) and DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX).
DFAPX is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Mar 7, 2011. DGSFX is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Nov 5, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DFAPX or DGSFX.
Performance
DFAPX vs. DGSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
DFAPX:
1.05
DGSFX:
1.32
DFAPX:
1.52
DGSFX:
1.85
DFAPX:
1.18
DGSFX:
1.22
DFAPX:
0.48
DGSFX:
0.47
DFAPX:
2.77
DGSFX:
4.21
DFAPX:
1.92%
DGSFX:
1.24%
DFAPX:
5.12%
DGSFX:
4.15%
DFAPX:
-19.45%
DGSFX:
-21.37%
DFAPX:
-5.85%
DGSFX:
-6.14%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAPX achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than DGSFX's 1.71% return.
DFAPX
2.52%
0.30%
0.76%
4.99%
2.31%
-0.65%
1.85%
DGSFX
1.71%
0.42%
0.47%
5.23%
2.79%
-0.34%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFAPX vs. DGSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAPX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DGSFX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DFAPX vs. DGSFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DFAPX
DGSFX
DFAPX vs. DGSFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) and DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
DFAPX vs. DGSFX - Dividend Comparison
DFAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than DGSFX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAPX DFA Investment Grade Portfolio | 3.68% | 3.80% | 3.31% | 2.62% | 2.76% | 2.14% | 2.73% | 2.67% | 2.22% | 2.12% | 2.46% | 2.42% |
DGSFX DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio | 4.19% | 4.26% | 4.09% | 1.97% | 1.51% | 1.72% | 3.37% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFAPX vs. DGSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAPX drawdown since its inception was -19.45%, smaller than the maximum DGSFX drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAPX and DGSFX.
Loading data...
Volatility
DFAPX vs. DGSFX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX) at 1.24%. This indicates that DFAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...