DFAI vs. PATN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DFAI (Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFAI is actively managed, while PATN is passively managed. Over the past year, DFAI returned 27.22% vs 53.28% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFAI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

DFAI vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 28.74% return.

DFAI

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.66%
• 6M: 6.44%
• YTD: 12.47%
• 1Y: 27.22%
• 3Y*: 18.65%
• 5Y*: 10.24%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.29%

PATN

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -3.34%
• 6M: 17.25%
• YTD: 28.74%
• 1Y: 53.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF	$74.51M	$70.03M	$61.85M
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	$6.30M	$4.83M	$3.83M

DFAI vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF	12.47%	34.04%	-5.77%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	28.74%	40.01%	-1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAI and PATN is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.81

The correlation between DFAI and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAI vs. PATN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFAI	PATN
Financial Services	23.1%	0.7%
Industrials	19.1%	17.5%
Technology	11.1%	43.9%
Healthcare	8.8%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	10.5%
Basic Materials	8.4%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	6.2%
Energy	5.8%	0.9%
Utilities	3.8%	-
Communication Services	3.6%	7.0%
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

DFAI vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFAI

DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 77
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 76

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 83
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFAI vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFAI	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.11	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.71	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.38	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	3.72	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.83	11.66	-1.83

DFAI vs. PATN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the PATN Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAI and PATN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFAI vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than PATN's maximum drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAI	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.44%	-16.77%	-10.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.95%	-14.40%	+3.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-9.34%	+9.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.01%	-3.44%	-1.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	4.58%	-1.80%

Volatility

DFAI vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) is 4.10%, while Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that DFAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAI	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	8.80%	-4.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	22.85%	-10.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.65%	25.38%	-10.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	22.70%	-6.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	22.70%	-7.01%

DFAI vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAI vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than PATN's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF	2.29%	2.45%	2.72%	2.64%	2.72%	2.06%	0.09%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.69%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAI and PATN in my portfolio?

DFAI and PATN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFAI or PATN?

PATN has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to DFAI (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs PATN's -16.77%.

Which ETF is better, DFAI or PATN?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 53.28% vs 27.22% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFAI has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAI or PATN?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 53.28% return vs 27.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAI or PATN?

DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAI or PATN?

DFAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 1.69% for PATN.

What is the main difference between DFAI and PATN?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.65% for PATN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.