PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAI vs. INTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAI vs. INTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFAI having a 10.08% return and INTF slightly higher at 10.41%.


DFAI

1D
0.84%
1M
2.35%
YTD
10.08%
6M
12.41%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*

INTF

1D
0.85%
1M
1.98%
YTD
10.41%
6M
13.21%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAI vs. INTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
10.08%34.04%4.68%17.60%-12.95%13.86%6.13%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
10.41%35.50%5.99%18.25%-12.31%11.70%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAI and INTF is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.98

The correlation between DFAI and INTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAI vs. INTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAI
INTF

Financial Services

22.5%
25.2%

Industrials

19.5%
19.1%

Technology

9.3%
8.5%

Basic Materials

8.8%
6.6%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.0%

Energy

6.8%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
6.3%

Utilities

4.0%
4.7%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.7%

Financial Services

DFAI
22.5%
INTF
25.2%

Industrials

DFAI
19.5%
INTF
19.1%

Technology

DFAI
9.3%
INTF
8.5%

Basic Materials

DFAI
8.8%
INTF
6.6%

Healthcare

DFAI
8.8%
INTF
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAI
8.6%
INTF
9.0%

Energy

DFAI
6.8%
INTF
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

DFAI
6.4%
INTF
6.3%

Utilities

DFAI
4.0%
INTF
4.7%

Communication Services

DFAI
3.7%
INTF
3.9%

Real Estate

DFAI
1.5%
INTF
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAI vs. INTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

INTF
INTF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAI vs. INTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAIINTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.56

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

10.14

-1.06

DFAI vs. INTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the INTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAI and INTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAIINTFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.80

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.60

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.45

+0.34

Drawdowns

DFAI vs. INTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum INTF drawdown of -40.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and INTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAIINTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-40.39%

+12.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-10.20%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-13.64%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

-29.26%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.19%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-7.69%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.57%

+0.22%

Volatility

DFAI vs. INTF - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) have volatilities of 4.39% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAIINTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.42%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

12.01%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

14.54%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

16.16%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

17.35%

-1.65%

DFAI vs. INTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than INTF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAI vs. INTF - Dividend Comparison

DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than INTF's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.24%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
2.60%2.87%3.53%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.26%1.66%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, DFAI and INTF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

INTF has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to DFAI (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs INTF's -40.39%.

On 5-year performance, INTF leads with 9.67% vs 9.55% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INTF has performed better with a 9.67% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INTF.

INTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.24% for DFAI.

DFAI is categorized as Global Equities, while INTF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.30% for INTF.

DFAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAI and INTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer