DFAI vs. FNDX
DFAI (Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. DFAI is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAI returned 9.46%/yr vs 13.11%/yr for FNDX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
DFAI vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.49% return.
DFAI
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 25.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 15.49%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
DFAI vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 10.05% | 34.04% | 4.68% | 17.60% | -12.95% | 13.86% | 5.34% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 15.49% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAI and FNDX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DFAI and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAI vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAI
FNDX
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAI
FNDX
Industrials
DFAI
FNDX
Basic Materials
DFAI
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
DFAI
FNDX
Healthcare
DFAI
FNDX
Technology
DFAI
FNDX
Energy
DFAI
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
DFAI
FNDX
Utilities
DFAI
FNDX
Communication Services
DFAI
FNDX
Real Estate
DFAI
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAI vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
DFAI
FNDX
DFAI vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAI | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.56 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 5.23 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 20.31 | -11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAI vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAI | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -37.72% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -6.06% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | -16.30% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | -19.06% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -3.55% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 1.56% | +1.26% |
Volatility
DFAI vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.18%. This indicates that DFAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAI | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 3.18% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 7.58% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 10.45% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 15.21% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 17.51% | -1.76% |
DFAI vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAI vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than FNDX's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 2.24% | 2.45% | 2.72% | 2.64% | 2.72% | 2.06% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAI and FNDX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAI has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to FNDX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 5-year performance, FNDX leads with 13.11% vs 9.46% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
DFAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.44% for FNDX.
DFAI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAI and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer