PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEW vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEW vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEW having a 12.69% return and GCOW slightly lower at 12.25%. Over the past 10 years, DEW has underperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 9.32%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.81% annualized return.


DEW

1D
0.98%
1M
1.07%
YTD
12.69%
6M
14.16%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
9.32%

GCOW

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
12.25%
6M
13.50%
1Y
27.54%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEW vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEW
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund
12.69%22.39%11.58%9.39%-2.73%21.29%-7.32%20.45%-10.58%15.38%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.25%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DEW and GCOW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.87

The correlation between DEW and GCOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEW vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEW
GCOW

Financial Services

19.7%

-

Energy

14.7%
24.4%

Utilities

10.8%
4.1%

Real Estate

10.8%

-

Healthcare

9.5%
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
17.1%

Industrials

4.4%
12.4%

Communication Services

4.1%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
4.6%

Basic Materials

2.8%
7.3%

Technology

2.5%
0.9%

Financial Services

DEW
19.7%
GCOW

-

Energy

DEW
14.7%
GCOW
24.4%

Utilities

DEW
10.8%
GCOW
4.1%

Real Estate

DEW
10.8%
GCOW

-

Healthcare

DEW
9.5%
GCOW
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

DEW
8.9%
GCOW
17.1%

Industrials

DEW
4.4%
GCOW
12.4%

Communication Services

DEW
4.1%
GCOW
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DEW
3.1%
GCOW
4.6%

Basic Materials

DEW
2.8%
GCOW
7.3%

Technology

DEW
2.5%
GCOW
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEW vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEW
DEW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEW vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEWGCOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.45

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

5.80

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.82

15.21

+1.61

DEW vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEW Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEW and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEWGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.56

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.92

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.61

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.59

-0.30

Drawdowns

DEW vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEW drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEW and GCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEWGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-37.64%

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-4.77%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.80%

-12.35%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.86%

-21.48%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

-37.64%

-1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-2.67%

+2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.44%

-5.84%

-6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.81%

-0.20%

Volatility

DEW vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) have volatilities of 2.86% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEWGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.75%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

7.99%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

10.80%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.00%

13.48%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

16.20%

-0.67%

DEW vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEW vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

DEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than GCOW's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEW
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund
3.19%3.71%4.02%4.55%3.82%3.55%4.10%3.74%4.17%3.18%3.42%4.32%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
5.39%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEW and GCOW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEW has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to GCOW (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEW dropped -65.55% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

On 10-year performance, GCOW leads with 9.81% vs 9.32% for DEW. On fees, DEW is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEW is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 3.19% for DEW.

DEW tracks WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DEW and 0.60% for GCOW.

DEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEW and GCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer