PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEW vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEW vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEW having a 12.63% return and FDL slightly lower at 12.30%. Over the past 10 years, DEW has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 9.68%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.


DEW

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
12.63%
6M
12.02%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
9.68%

FDL

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
12.30%
6M
12.10%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEW vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEW
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund
12.63%22.39%11.58%9.39%-2.73%21.29%-7.32%20.45%-10.58%15.38%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
12.30%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DEW and FDL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006

0.77

The correlation between DEW and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DEW vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEW
FDL

Financial Services

19.7%
15.2%

Energy

14.7%
25.7%

Utilities

10.8%
6.5%

Real Estate

10.8%

-

Healthcare

9.5%
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
14.4%

Industrials

4.4%
3.9%

Communication Services

4.1%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
4.7%

Basic Materials

2.8%
0.3%

Technology

2.5%
1.4%

Financial Services

DEW
19.7%
FDL
15.2%

Energy

DEW
14.7%
FDL
25.7%

Utilities

DEW
10.8%
FDL
6.5%

Real Estate

DEW
10.8%
FDL

-

Healthcare

DEW
9.5%
FDL
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

DEW
8.9%
FDL
14.4%

Industrials

DEW
4.4%
FDL
3.9%

Communication Services

DEW
4.1%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DEW
3.1%
FDL
4.7%

Basic Materials

DEW
2.8%
FDL
0.3%

Technology

DEW
2.5%
FDL
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEW vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEW
DEW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEW vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEWFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.33

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

5.15

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

12.05

+3.05

DEW vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEW Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEW and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEW vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEW drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEW and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEWFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-65.93%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-4.27%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.80%

-12.24%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.86%

-16.46%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

-41.40%

+2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-3.40%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-9.63%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.82%

-0.20%

Volatility

DEW vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) is 2.78%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that DEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEWFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

3.54%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

8.10%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

11.55%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

14.31%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

17.11%

-1.70%

DEW vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEW vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

DEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FDL's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEW
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund
3.19%3.71%4.02%4.55%3.82%3.55%4.10%3.74%4.17%3.18%3.42%4.32%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.71%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEW and FDL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to DEW (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEW dropped -65.55% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.09% vs 9.68% for DEW. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DEW.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 3.19% for DEW.

DEW tracks WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DEW and 0.43% for FDL.

DEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEW and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer