DEW vs. FDL
DEW (WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - DEW tracks the WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index while FDL tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DEW returned 9.68%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for FDL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEW charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
DEW vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEW having a 12.63% return and FDL slightly lower at 12.30%. Over the past 10 years, DEW has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 9.68%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.
DEW
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 6M
- 12.02%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
FDL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
DEW vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 12.63% | 22.39% | 11.58% | 9.39% | -2.73% | 21.29% | -7.32% | 20.45% | -10.58% | 15.38% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 12.30% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 26.10% | -4.30% | 24.41% | -5.99% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEW and FDL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006 | 0.77 |
The correlation between DEW and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DEW vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEW
FDL
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
DEW
FDL
Energy
DEW
FDL
Utilities
DEW
FDL
Real Estate
DEW
FDL
-
Healthcare
DEW
FDL
Consumer Defensive
DEW
FDL
Industrials
DEW
FDL
Communication Services
DEW
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
DEW
FDL
Basic Materials
DEW
FDL
Technology
DEW
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEW vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
DEW
FDL
DEW vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEW | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.33 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 5.15 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.10 | 12.05 | +3.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEW vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEW drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEW and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEW | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.55% | -65.93% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -4.27% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.80% | -12.24% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.86% | -16.46% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.77% | -41.40% | +2.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -3.40% | +1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -9.63% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.82% | -0.20% |
Volatility
DEW vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) is 2.78%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that DEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEW | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 3.54% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.36% | 8.10% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.75% | 11.55% | -1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 14.31% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 17.11% | -1.70% |
DEW vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEW vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
DEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FDL's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 3.19% | 3.71% | 4.02% | 4.55% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.10% | 3.74% | 4.17% | 3.18% | 3.42% | 4.32% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.71% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEW and FDL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDL has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to DEW (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEW dropped -65.55% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.09% vs 9.68% for DEW. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DEW.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 3.19% for DEW.
DEW tracks WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DEW and 0.43% for FDL.
DEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEW and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer