PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEUS vs. VFMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEUS vs. VFMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEUS achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than VFMF's 14.86% return.


DEUS

1D
0.18%
1M
3.32%
YTD
11.11%
6M
11.96%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
11.33%

VFMF

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.05%
YTD
14.86%
6M
16.06%
1Y
33.52%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEUS vs. VFMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
11.11%10.41%14.33%14.73%-11.18%26.31%8.81%28.80%-9.89%
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
14.86%17.38%15.60%18.52%-5.70%30.05%4.99%22.34%-11.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DEUS and VFMF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.93

The correlation between DEUS and VFMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEUS vs. VFMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEUS
VFMF

Industrials

17.6%
9.0%

Technology

15.5%
12.7%

Financial Services

12.1%
24.6%

Healthcare

11.4%
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
6.8%

Utilities

7.3%
0.2%

Energy

5.5%
7.3%

Basic Materials

4.5%
3.4%

Real Estate

4.3%
0.3%

Communication Services

3.8%
5.0%

Industrials

DEUS
17.6%
VFMF
9.0%

Technology

DEUS
15.5%
VFMF
12.7%

Financial Services

DEUS
12.1%
VFMF
24.6%

Healthcare

DEUS
11.4%
VFMF
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DEUS
10.6%
VFMF
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

DEUS
7.5%
VFMF
6.8%

Utilities

DEUS
7.3%
VFMF
0.2%

Energy

DEUS
5.5%
VFMF
7.3%

Basic Materials

DEUS
4.5%
VFMF
3.4%

Real Estate

DEUS
4.3%
VFMF
0.3%

Communication Services

DEUS
3.8%
VFMF
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEUS vs. VFMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEUS
DEUS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMF
VFMF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VFMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEUS vs. VFMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEUSVFMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.57

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

3.68

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

4.76

-2.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.39

17.87

-7.47

DEUS vs. VFMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the VFMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEUS and VFMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEUSVFMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.57

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.72

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.57

+0.07

Drawdowns

DEUS vs. VFMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEUS drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, roughly equal to the maximum VFMF drawdown of -41.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEUS and VFMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEUSVFMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-41.34%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-7.08%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-20.57%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.89%

-20.57%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.44%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-5.74%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.88%

-0.08%

Volatility

DEUS vs. VFMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) is 2.79%, while Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that DEUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEUSVFMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.97%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

9.07%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

13.14%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

18.10%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

21.15%

-3.17%

DEUS vs. VFMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEUS has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than VFMF's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DEUS vs. VFMF - Dividend Comparison

DEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than VFMF's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
1.45%1.59%1.36%1.49%1.74%1.14%1.61%1.65%1.77%1.31%2.75%
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.37%1.54%1.60%1.78%2.21%1.39%1.56%1.61%1.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEUS and VFMF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFMF has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to DEUS (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEUS dropped -40.47% vs VFMF's -41.34%.

On 5-year performance, VFMF leads with 12.93% vs 9.39% for DEUS. On fees, DEUS is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMF has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEUS is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for VFMF.

DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.37% for VFMF.

DEUS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFMF is Multi-factor. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DEUS and 0.18% for VFMF.

VFMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEUS and VFMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer