PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DES vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DES vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 14.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DES has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 8.17%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.


DES

1D
0.99%
1M
0.53%
YTD
16.63%
6M
17.07%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
8.17%

VB

1D
0.75%
1M
3.68%
YTD
14.91%
6M
16.03%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DES vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
16.63%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-12.85%8.64%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.91%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DES and VB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.92

The correlation between DES and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DES vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DES
VB

Financial Services

23.7%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
11.3%

Industrials

13.3%
20.8%

Energy

10.7%
4.7%

Real Estate

9.6%
7.6%

Basic Materials

6.0%
4.8%

Technology

5.5%
17.2%

Utilities

4.6%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.4%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.1%

Healthcare

1.7%
11.1%

Financial Services

DES
23.7%
VB
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DES
14.8%
VB
11.3%

Industrials

DES
13.3%
VB
20.8%

Energy

DES
10.7%
VB
4.7%

Real Estate

DES
9.6%
VB
7.6%

Basic Materials

DES
6.0%
VB
4.8%

Technology

DES
5.5%
VB
17.2%

Utilities

DES
4.6%
VB
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

DES
4.3%
VB
3.4%

Communication Services

DES
2.8%
VB
3.1%

Healthcare

DES
1.7%
VB
11.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DES vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DES vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DESVBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

1.94

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

2.75

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

3.48

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.48

12.82

-2.35

DES vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DES Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DES and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DESVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.94

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.36

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.53

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.44

-0.12

Drawdowns

DES vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than VB's maximum drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.48%

-59.56%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-8.98%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-25.36%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-28.15%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.65%

-42.05%

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-8.44%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.43%

+0.25%

Volatility

DES vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.40%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

11.73%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

16.27%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

20.75%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

21.43%

+0.54%

DES vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DES vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than VB's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.37%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DES and VB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to DES (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.38% vs 8.17% for DES. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DES has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.

DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.19% for VB.

DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.05% for VB.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DES and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer