PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DES vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DES vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 24.40% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 56.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DES has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 8.19%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.


DES

1D
1.38%
1M
2.25%
6M
14.77%
YTD
24.40%
1Y
34.94%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
8.19%
ALL TIME*
7.95%

TNA

1D
5.04%
1M
-2.54%
6M
31.47%
YTD
56.19%
1Y
119.05%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
-2.29%
10Y*
6.91%
ALL TIME*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.72M$4.44M$5.66M
$289.87M$297.37M$409.17M

DES vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
24.40%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-12.85%8.64%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
56.19%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DES and TNA is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008

0.92

The correlation between DES and TNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DES vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DES
TNA

Financial Services

25.2%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
9.2%

Industrials

13.6%
14.2%

Real Estate

9.9%
6.6%

Energy

9.5%
5.5%

Technology

6.2%
14.8%

Basic Materials

6.1%
4.4%

Utilities

4.1%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.2%

Healthcare

2.1%
20.3%

Financial Services

DES
25.2%
TNA
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DES
16.3%
TNA
9.2%

Industrials

DES
13.6%
TNA
14.2%

Real Estate

DES
9.9%
TNA
6.6%

Energy

DES
9.5%
TNA
5.5%

Technology

DES
6.2%
TNA
14.8%

Basic Materials

DES
6.1%
TNA
4.4%

Utilities

DES
4.1%
TNA
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

DES
4.1%
TNA
2.6%

Communication Services

DES
2.9%
TNA
2.2%

Healthcare

DES
2.1%
TNA
20.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DES vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DES vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DESTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

3.68

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.84

12.08

+1.76

DES vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DES Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DES and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DES vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.48%

-88.09%

+22.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-32.53%

+24.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-65.78%

+40.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-82.36%

+57.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.65%

-88.09%

+42.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-33.94%

+33.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-33.92%

+24.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

9.89%

-7.36%

Volatility

DES vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) is 3.55%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that DES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

12.47%

-8.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

42.13%

-31.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

57.70%

-41.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

67.24%

-47.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

68.38%

-46.45%

DES vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DES vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than TNA's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.23%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.30%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DES and TNA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to DES (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, DES leads with 8.19% vs 6.91% for TNA. On fees, DES is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DES has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DES has performed better with a 8.19% return vs 6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DES is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.30% for TNA.

DES is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 1.05% for TNA.

DES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DES and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer