PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DES vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DES vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 19.31% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 56.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DES has underperformed TNA with an annualized return of 8.55%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.70% annualized return.


DES

1D
0.66%
1M
3.24%
YTD
19.31%
6M
18.13%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
8.55%

TNA

1D
-3.11%
1M
9.59%
YTD
56.90%
6M
45.88%
1Y
125.39%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
-5.98%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DES vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
19.31%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-12.85%8.64%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
56.90%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DES and TNA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008

0.93

The correlation between DES and TNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DES vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DES
TNA

Financial Services

24.8%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
8.0%

Industrials

13.4%
18.0%

Energy

10.2%
5.4%

Real Estate

10.1%
5.9%

Basic Materials

6.3%
4.7%

Technology

6.0%
19.1%

Utilities

4.2%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
2.3%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.4%

Healthcare

2.0%
16.3%

Financial Services

DES
24.8%
TNA
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DES
16.0%
TNA
8.0%

Industrials

DES
13.4%
TNA
18.0%

Energy

DES
10.2%
TNA
5.4%

Real Estate

DES
10.1%
TNA
5.9%

Basic Materials

DES
6.3%
TNA
4.7%

Technology

DES
6.0%
TNA
19.1%

Utilities

DES
4.2%
TNA
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

DES
4.1%
TNA
2.3%

Communication Services

DES
2.8%
TNA
2.4%

Healthcare

DES
2.0%
TNA
16.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DES vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DES vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DESTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

3.88

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.90

12.72

-1.82

DES vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DES Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DES and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DES vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.48%

-88.09%

+22.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-32.53%

+24.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-65.78%

+40.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-82.36%

+57.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.65%

-88.09%

+42.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-33.64%

+32.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-33.92%

+24.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

9.89%

-7.23%

Volatility

DES vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) is 3.95%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 19.82%. This indicates that DES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

19.82%

-15.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

42.69%

-31.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

58.76%

-42.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

67.57%

-48.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

68.50%

-46.54%

DES vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DES vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than TNA's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.31%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.38%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DES and TNA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to DES (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, TNA leads with 9.70% vs 8.55% for DES. On fees, DES is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DES has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TNA has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DES is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.38% for TNA.

DES is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DES and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer