PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DES vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DES vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 8.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DES has underperformed CSB with an annualized return of 8.04%, while CSB has yielded a comparatively higher 9.58% annualized return.


DES

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.67%
YTD
15.19%
6M
14.26%
1Y
25.57%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
8.04%

CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DES vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
15.19%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-12.85%8.64%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DES and CSB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.91

The correlation between DES and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

DES vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DES
CSB

Financial Services

23.7%
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
19.0%

Industrials

13.3%
8.5%

Energy

10.7%
11.5%

Real Estate

9.6%

-

Basic Materials

6.0%
3.4%

Technology

5.5%
1.2%

Utilities

4.6%
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.4%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.6%

Healthcare

1.7%
0.4%

Financial Services

DES
23.7%
CSB
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DES
14.8%
CSB
19.0%

Industrials

DES
13.3%
CSB
8.5%

Energy

DES
10.7%
CSB
11.5%

Real Estate

DES
9.6%
CSB

-

Basic Materials

DES
6.0%
CSB
3.4%

Technology

DES
5.5%
CSB
1.2%

Utilities

DES
4.6%
CSB
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

DES
4.3%
CSB
4.4%

Communication Services

DES
2.8%
CSB
3.6%

Healthcare

DES
1.7%
CSB
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DES vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DES vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DESCSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

1.25

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

1.92

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.51

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.57

7.26

+2.32

DES vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DES Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DES and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DESCSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.25

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.20

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.45

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.45

-0.13

Drawdowns

DES vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than CSB's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.48%

-42.07%

-23.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-7.18%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-21.82%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-24.49%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.65%

-42.07%

-3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-3.12%

+1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-7.14%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.48%

+0.20%

Volatility

DES vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that DES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

3.59%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

9.19%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

14.54%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.57%

18.78%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

21.31%

+0.66%

DES vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DES vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.40%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DES and CSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DES has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 10-year performance, CSB leads with 9.58% vs 8.04% for DES. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CSB has performed better with a 9.58% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.40% for DES.

DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.35% for CSB.

DES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DES and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer