PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DES vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DES vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 19.31% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DES has underperformed CSB with an annualized return of 8.55%, while CSB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.


DES

1D
0.66%
1M
3.24%
YTD
19.31%
6M
18.13%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
8.55%

CSB

1D
1.01%
1M
0.76%
YTD
11.28%
6M
10.03%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DES vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
19.31%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-12.85%8.64%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
11.28%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DES and CSB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.91

The correlation between DES and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

DES vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DES
CSB

Financial Services

24.8%
26.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
19.5%

Industrials

13.4%
8.5%

Energy

10.2%
10.6%

Real Estate

10.1%

-

Basic Materials

6.3%
3.6%

Technology

6.0%
1.3%

Utilities

4.2%
21.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
4.0%

Communication Services

2.8%
4.0%

Healthcare

2.0%
0.4%

Financial Services

DES
24.8%
CSB
26.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DES
16.0%
CSB
19.5%

Industrials

DES
13.4%
CSB
8.5%

Energy

DES
10.2%
CSB
10.6%

Real Estate

DES
10.1%
CSB

-

Basic Materials

DES
6.3%
CSB
3.6%

Technology

DES
6.0%
CSB
1.3%

Utilities

DES
4.2%
CSB
21.7%

Consumer Defensive

DES
4.1%
CSB
4.0%

Communication Services

DES
2.8%
CSB
4.0%

Healthcare

DES
2.0%
CSB
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DES vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DES vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DESCSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

2.92

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.90

8.44

+2.46

DES vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DES Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DES and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DES vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than CSB's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.48%

-42.07%

-23.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-7.18%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-21.82%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-24.49%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.65%

-42.07%

-3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.75%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-7.11%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.48%

+0.18%

Volatility

DES vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.79%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

9.28%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

14.48%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

18.71%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

21.31%

+0.65%

DES vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DES vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than CSB's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.22%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.31%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DES and CSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DES has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to CSB (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 10-year performance, CSB leads with 10.15% vs 8.55% for DES. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CSB has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.31% for DES.

DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.35% for CSB.

DES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DES and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer