EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L).

EIMI.L and IEEM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. IEEM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Nov 18, 2005. Both EIMI.L and IEEM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF	4.48%	32.16%	7.36%	11.03%	-19.67%	-0.65%	18.80%	16.37%	-14.17%	36.95%
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)	4.54%	36.22%	8.04%	9.34%	-19.53%	-2.28%	19.51%	17.16%	-14.23%	36.94%

Different Trading Currencies

EIMI.L is traded in USD, while IEEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IEEM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EIMI.L having a 4.48% return and IEEM.L slightly higher at 4.54%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIMI.L having a 8.46% annualized return and IEEM.L not far ahead at 8.71%.

EIMI.L

• 1D: 4.13%
• 1M: -5.98%
• YTD: 4.48%
• 6M: 8.17%
• 1Y: 33.96%
• 3Y*: 16.49%
• 5Y*: 4.75%
• 10Y*: 8.46%

IEEM.L

• 1D: 3.90%
• 1M: -6.33%
• YTD: 4.54%
• 6M: 8.61%
• 1Y: 35.47%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 4.90%
• 10Y*: 8.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EIMI.L and IEEM.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

EIMI.L

iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF

IEEM.L

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)

Return for Risk

EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIMI.L

EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

IEEM.L

IEEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
IEEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
IEEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
IEEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IEEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
IEEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EIMI.L	IEEM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.85	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.38	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.69	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.80	10.01	-0.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the IEEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIMI.L and IEEM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EIMI.L	IEEM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.85	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.27	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.45	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.21	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between EIMI.L and IEEM.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L - Dividend Comparison

EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)	2.40%	2.48%	2.86%	2.91%	3.40%	2.74%	1.98%	2.32%	2.51%	1.86%	2.09%	3.38%

Drawdowns

EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIMI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.73%, smaller than the maximum IEEM.L drawdown of -64.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMI.L and IEEM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIMI.L	IEEM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.73%	-53.22%	+14.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.66%	-11.12%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.66%	-23.27%	-12.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.73%	-26.63%	-12.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.03%	-7.69%	-1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-10.48%	-3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.14%	+0.33%

Volatility

EIMI.L vs. IEEM.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) have volatilities of 8.48% and 8.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIMI.L	IEEM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.48%	8.21%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.79%	13.91%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.87%	19.08%	-0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.75%	18.32%	-0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	19.38%	-0.48%