DEEP vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEEP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DEEP returned 27.76% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

DEEP vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.

DEEP

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 11.91%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 3.74%
• 10Y*: 8.15%

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	12.39%	9.71%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

DEEP vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP

DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 42
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 42

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEEP	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	5.01	-3.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	7.92	-5.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	2.39	-1.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	17.00	-14.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	70.66	-63.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEEP vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEP and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEEP	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	5.01	-3.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	4.28	-3.98

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEEP	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.52%	-0.50%	-52.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.87%	-0.27%	-11.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	0.00%	-2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.40%	-0.06%	-10.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	0.07%	+4.05%

Volatility

DEEP vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEEP	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	0.30%	+5.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.29%	0.79%	+11.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	0.92%	+18.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.65%	1.05%	+20.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.27%	1.05%	+23.22%

DEEP vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEEP vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	1.52%	1.78%	1.96%	1.67%	1.28%	1.43%	4.03%	3.49%	1.51%	2.01%	3.14%	3.98%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEEP and RBIL in my portfolio?

DEEP and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEEP or RBIL?

DEEP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, DEEP or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, DEEP leads with 27.76% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEEP or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, DEEP has performed better with a 27.76% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEEP or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEEP or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.52% for DEEP.

What is the main difference between DEEP and RBIL?

DEEP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.