DEEP vs. QLVD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD).

DEEP and QLVD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEEP is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2014. QLVD is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2019. Both DEEP and QLVD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DEEP vs. QLVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DEEP vs. QLVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	2.58%	5.69%	-2.97%	22.37%	-17.71%	35.66%	-9.96%	4.48%
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	3.29%	24.21%	4.67%	11.57%	-12.09%	9.04%	3.00%	6.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than QLVD's 3.29% return.

DEEP

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -3.64%
• YTD: 2.58%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: 6.93%
• 5Y*: 3.03%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

QLVD

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -5.62%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 6.74%
• 1Y: 17.40%
• 3Y*: 12.29%
• 5Y*: 7.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. QLVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QLVD's 0.32% expense ratio.

DEEP

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF

QLVD

FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund

Return for Risk

DEEP vs. QLVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP

DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 50
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 45

QLVD

QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 77
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. QLVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEEP	QLVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.41	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	2.00	-0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.28	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	2.11	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	8.00	-3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEEP vs. QLVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEP Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the QLVD Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEP and QLVD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEEP	QLVD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	1.41	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.62	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.50	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and QLVD is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DEEP vs. QLVD - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than QLVD's 2.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF	1.66%	1.78%	1.96%	1.67%	1.28%	1.43%	4.03%	3.49%	1.51%	2.01%	3.14%	3.98%
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	2.77%	2.87%	3.01%	3.33%	2.47%	3.06%	1.78%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. QLVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than QLVD's maximum drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and QLVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEEP	QLVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.52%	-28.20%	-24.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.91%	-8.15%	-5.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.40%	-23.99%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.29%	-5.62%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.53%	-5.27%	-5.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.74%	2.14%	+2.60%

Volatility

DEEP vs. QLVD - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) have volatilities of 5.23% and 5.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEEP	QLVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	5.23%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	7.71%	+5.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.83%	12.43%	+10.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.71%	11.68%	+10.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.27%	14.02%	+10.25%