DEEP vs. HTUS
DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEEP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. DEEP is passively managed, while HTUS is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, DEEP returned 8.15%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for HTUS. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
DEEP vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than HTUS's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, DEEP has underperformed HTUS with an annualized return of 8.15%, while HTUS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.
DEEP
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
DEEP vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 12.39% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 22.37% | -17.71% | 35.66% | -9.96% | 12.54% | -7.17% | 27.19% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 11.33% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 20.27% | -10.04% | 14.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and HTUS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015 | 0.51 |
The correlation between DEEP and HTUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEEP vs. HTUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEEP
HTUS
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Industrials
DEEP
HTUS
Consumer Cyclical
DEEP
HTUS
Consumer Defensive
DEEP
HTUS
Financial Services
DEEP
HTUS
Technology
DEEP
HTUS
Healthcare
DEEP
HTUS
Energy
DEEP
HTUS
Basic Materials
DEEP
HTUS
Communication Services
DEEP
HTUS
Real Estate
DEEP
HTUS
Utilities
DEEP
-
HTUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEEP vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
DEEP
HTUS
DEEP vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEEP | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.50 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 3.35 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 17.27 | -10.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEEP | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.53 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.81 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.59 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.58 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than HTUS's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEP | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -47.50% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -8.68% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -24.41% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.40% | -24.41% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.52% | -47.50% | -5.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -0.55% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -4.06% | -6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 1.68% | +2.44% |
Volatility
DEEP vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) at 2.47%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEEP | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 2.47% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 9.39% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 11.50% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 19.03% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 21.45% | +2.82% |
DEEP vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEEP vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than HTUS's 10.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.52% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.68% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEEP and HTUS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEEP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to HTUS (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs HTUS's -47.50%.
On 10-year performance, HTUS leads with 12.52% vs 8.15% for DEEP. On fees, DEEP is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEEP is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 1.52% for DEEP.
DEEP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while HTUS is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEEP and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer