DEEP vs. HTEC
DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEEP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEEP returned 5.26%/yr vs -5.86%/yr for HTEC. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
DEEP vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's -0.55% return.
DEEP
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 31.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
HTEC
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- -5.86%
- 10Y*
- —
DEEP vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 17.68% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 22.37% | -17.71% | 35.66% | -9.96% | 10.64% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | -0.55% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 65.01% | 8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and HTEC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between DEEP and HTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEEP vs. HTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEEP
HTEC
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
DEEP
HTEC
-
Industrials
DEEP
HTEC
Consumer Defensive
DEEP
HTEC
-
Financial Services
DEEP
HTEC
Technology
DEEP
HTEC
Healthcare
DEEP
HTEC
Energy
DEEP
HTEC
Basic Materials
DEEP
HTEC
-
Communication Services
DEEP
HTEC
-
Real Estate
DEEP
HTEC
-
Utilities
DEEP
-
HTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEEP vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
DEEP
HTEC
DEEP vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEEP | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 1.77 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 4.22 | +3.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEP | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -57.53% | +5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -16.31% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -28.67% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.40% | -56.10% | +27.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -31.59% | +31.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | -29.00% | +18.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 6.81% | -2.69% |
Volatility
DEEP vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) is 4.88%, while ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that DEEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEEP | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 6.74% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 15.77% | -3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 20.92% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 24.50% | -2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 25.46% | -1.21% |
DEEP vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEEP vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than HTEC's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEEP and HTEC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTEC has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to DEEP (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs HTEC's -57.53%.
On 5-year performance, DEEP leads with 5.26% vs -5.86% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, DEEP has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DEEP has performed better with a 5.26% return vs -5.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.
DEEP has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.99% for HTEC.
DEEP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while HTEC tracks ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.68% for HTEC.
DEEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEEP and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer