DEEP vs. ECML
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML).
DEEP and ECML are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEEP is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2014. ECML is an actively managed fund by Euclidean. It was launched on May 17, 2023.
Performance
DEEP vs. ECML - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DEEP vs. ECML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 2.58% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 15.31% |
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 8.76% | 6.82% | 2.37% | 24.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than ECML's 8.76% return.
DEEP
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
ECML
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEEP vs. ECML - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than ECML's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DEEP vs. ECML — Risk / Return Rank
DEEP
ECML
DEEP vs. ECML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEEP | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.05 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.62 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.61 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 6.01 | -1.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEEP | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.05 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.79 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and ECML is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DEEP vs. ECML - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than ECML's 1.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.66% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 1.26% | 1.38% | 0.98% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. ECML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than ECML's maximum drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and ECML.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEP | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -24.66% | -27.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.91% | -12.96% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.29% | -2.69% | -3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -6.19% | -4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 3.48% | +1.26% |
Volatility
DEEP vs. ECML - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) at 4.48%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DEEP | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 4.48% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.45% | 10.17% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.83% | 19.29% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 18.69% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 18.69% | +5.58% |