PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEEP vs. DGRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEEP vs. DGRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DEEP having a 17.68% return and DGRS slightly higher at 18.11%. Over the past 10 years, DEEP has underperformed DGRS with an annualized return of 8.73%, while DGRS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.20% annualized return.


DEEP

1D
0.49%
1M
5.91%
YTD
17.68%
6M
17.12%
1Y
31.10%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
8.73%

DGRS

1D
0.27%
1M
4.10%
YTD
18.11%
6M
16.32%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. DGRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
17.68%5.69%-2.97%22.37%-17.71%35.66%-9.96%12.54%-7.17%27.19%
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
18.11%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%23.11%7.86%24.20%-10.75%7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and DGRS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014

0.85

The correlation between DEEP and DGRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEEP vs. DGRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEEP
DGRS

Consumer Cyclical

26.6%
16.1%

Industrials

25.3%
19.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
6.3%

Financial Services

9.2%
25.5%

Technology

8.5%
9.2%

Healthcare

7.0%
1.2%

Energy

5.2%
10.8%

Basic Materials

4.5%
8.1%

Communication Services

3.9%
1.9%

Real Estate

3.1%
1.8%

Utilities

-

0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DEEP
26.6%
DGRS
16.1%

Industrials

DEEP
25.3%
DGRS
19.1%

Consumer Defensive

DEEP
9.8%
DGRS
6.3%

Financial Services

DEEP
9.2%
DGRS
25.5%

Technology

DEEP
8.5%
DGRS
9.2%

Healthcare

DEEP
7.0%
DGRS
1.2%

Energy

DEEP
5.2%
DGRS
10.8%

Basic Materials

DEEP
4.5%
DGRS
8.1%

Communication Services

DEEP
3.9%
DGRS
1.9%

Real Estate

DEEP
3.1%
DGRS
1.8%

Utilities

DEEP

-

DGRS
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEEP vs. DGRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP
DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. DGRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEEPDGRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.03

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

9.34

-1.78

DEEP vs. DGRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the DGRS Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEP and DGRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. DGRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than DGRS's maximum drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and DGRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEPDGRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.52%

-44.83%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-9.68%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.40%

-27.57%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.40%

-27.57%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.52%

-44.83%

-7.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.40%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-6.70%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

3.13%

+0.99%

Volatility

DEEP vs. DGRS - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) at 3.99%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEPDGRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

3.99%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

11.29%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.29%

17.91%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

20.38%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.25%

23.61%

+0.64%

DEEP vs. DGRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEEP vs. DGRS - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DGRS's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
1.45%1.78%1.96%1.67%1.28%1.43%4.03%3.49%1.51%2.01%3.14%3.98%
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.14%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEEP and DGRS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEEP has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to DGRS (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs DGRS's -44.83%.

On 10-year performance, DGRS leads with 10.20% vs 8.73% for DEEP. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRS has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.45% for DEEP.

DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.38% for DGRS.

DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEEP and DGRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer