DEEF vs. PATN
DEEF (Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DEEF tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index while PATN tracks the Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DEEF returned 23.80% vs 73.16% for PATN. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEEF charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.
Performance
DEEF vs. PATN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEF achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 40.52% return.
DEEF
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.28%
PATN
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 16.77%
- YTD
- 40.52%
- 6M
- 44.04%
- 1Y
- 73.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEEF vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF | 10.24% | 32.36% | -6.92% |
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF | 40.52% | 40.01% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEF and PATN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between DEEF and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEEF vs. PATN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEEF
PATN
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
DEEF
PATN
Financial Services
DEEF
PATN
Consumer Cyclical
DEEF
PATN
Consumer Defensive
DEEF
PATN
Basic Materials
DEEF
PATN
Utilities
DEEF
PATN
-
Real Estate
DEEF
PATN
-
Energy
DEEF
PATN
Technology
DEEF
PATN
Healthcare
DEEF
PATN
Communication Services
DEEF
PATN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEEF vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank
DEEF
PATN
DEEF vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEEF | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.60 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 5.11 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 20.70 | -12.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEEF | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 3.47 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 2.28 | -1.78 |
Drawdowns
DEEF vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEF drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, which is greater than PATN's maximum drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEF and PATN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEF | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.48% | -16.77% | -19.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -14.40% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.63% | -0.39% | -3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -3.15% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.55% | -0.50% |
Volatility
DEEF vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) is 3.88%, while Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that DEEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEEF | PATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 8.84% | -4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 18.16% | -6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 21.18% | -7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 20.85% | -5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 20.85% | -4.56% |
DEEF vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEEF vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison
DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than PATN's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF | 3.38% | 3.63% | 4.04% | 3.96% | 3.31% | 3.84% | 2.71% | 3.74% | 2.80% | 2.61% | 4.35% |
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF | 1.60% | 2.25% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEEF and PATN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATN has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to DEEF (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEF dropped -36.48% vs PATN's -16.77%.
On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 73.16% vs 23.80% for DEEF. On fees, DEEF is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, DEEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 73.16% return vs 23.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEEF is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.
DEEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 1.60% for PATN.
DEEF tracks FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index, while PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DEEF and 0.65% for PATN.
PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEEF and PATN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer