PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECU vs. UXAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECU vs. UXAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECU achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than UXAP's 11.50% return.


DECU

1D
-0.61%
1M
3.88%
YTD
7.56%
6M
7.40%
1Y
18.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXAP

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.70%
YTD
11.50%
6M
11.41%
1Y
29.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECU vs. UXAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DECU and UXAP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2025

0.97

The correlation between DECU and UXAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECU vs. UXAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECU
DECU Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

UXAP
UXAP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
UXAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UXAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
UXAP Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UXAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
UXAP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECU vs. UXAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DECUUXAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.82

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

12.81

-0.57

DECU vs. UXAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECU Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the UXAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECU and UXAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DECUUXAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.17

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

3.18

-2.10

Drawdowns

DECU vs. UXAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, roughly equal to the maximum UXAP drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and UXAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECUUXAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-10.45%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-10.45%

+4.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.66%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-1.24%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

2.29%

-0.77%

Volatility

DECU vs. UXAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) is 2.35%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that DECU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECUUXAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

3.26%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

10.36%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

13.59%

-4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

14.15%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

14.15%

-3.57%

DECU vs. UXAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than UXAP's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECU vs. UXAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECU nor UXAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DECU and UXAP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UXAP has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to DECU (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs UXAP's -10.45%.

On 1-year performance, UXAP leads with 29.33% vs 18.55% for DECU. On fees, DECU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, DECU has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UXAP has performed better with a 29.33% return vs 18.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DECU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXAP.

DECU and UXAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DECU and 0.85% for UXAP.

UXAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECU and UXAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer