DECU vs. UXAP
DECU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF) and UXAP (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DECU returned 18.55% vs 29.33% for UXAP. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DECU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXAP.
Performance
DECU vs. UXAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DECU achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than UXAP's 11.50% return.
DECU
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 18.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXAP
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DECU vs. UXAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DECU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF | 7.56% | 18.48% |
UXAP FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April | 11.50% | 35.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECU and UXAP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2025 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DECU and UXAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECU vs. UXAP — Risk / Return Rank
DECU
UXAP
DECU vs. UXAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DECU | UXAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.38 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.82 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 12.81 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DECU | UXAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.17 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 3.18 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
DECU vs. UXAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, roughly equal to the maximum UXAP drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and UXAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECU | UXAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -10.45% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.65% | -10.45% | +4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.66% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -1.24% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 2.29% | -0.77% |
Volatility
DECU vs. UXAP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) is 2.35%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that DECU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECU | UXAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 3.26% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.15% | 10.36% | -4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 13.59% | -4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 14.15% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 14.15% | -3.57% |
DECU vs. UXAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DECU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than UXAP's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DECU vs. UXAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither DECU nor UXAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, DECU and UXAP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UXAP has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to DECU (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs UXAP's -10.45%.
On 1-year performance, UXAP leads with 29.33% vs 18.55% for DECU. On fees, DECU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, DECU has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UXAP has performed better with a 29.33% return vs 18.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DECU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXAP.
DECU and UXAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DECU and 0.85% for UXAP.
UXAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DECU and UXAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer