DDX vs. AOR
DDX (Defined Duration 10 ETF) and AOR (iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. DDX is actively managed, while AOR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DDX returned 8.16%/yr vs 14.21%/yr for AOR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
DDX vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDX achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than AOR's 7.39% return.
DDX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOR
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
DDX vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 4.86% | 12.02% | 2.93% | 10.48% | -16.19% | 1.34% |
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 7.39% | 16.44% | 10.68% | 15.75% | -15.64% | 3.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDX and AOR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DDX and AOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
DDX vs. AOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDX
AOR
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DDX
AOR
Technology
DDX
AOR
Industrials
DDX
AOR
Healthcare
DDX
AOR
Consumer Cyclical
DDX
AOR
Consumer Defensive
DDX
AOR
Communication Services
DDX
AOR
Energy
DDX
AOR
Basic Materials
DDX
AOR
Utilities
DDX
AOR
Real Estate
DDX
AOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDX vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
DDX
AOR
DDX vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDX | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.43 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.90 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | 12.69 | -0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDX | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.29 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.69 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
DDX vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDX drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum AOR drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDX and AOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDX | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -24.44% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.41% | -6.64% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | -9.77% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.53% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -3.48% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.52% | -0.43% |
Volatility
DDX vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) is 2.03%, while iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that DDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDX | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 2.72% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.46% | 6.81% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.47% | 8.42% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 10.55% | -3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 10.67% | -3.19% |
DDX vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DDX and AOR have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DDX vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
DDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than AOR's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.47% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 3.39% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.41% | 1.38% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDX and AOR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOR has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to DDX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDX dropped -21.27% vs AOR's -24.44%.
On 3-year performance, AOR leads with 14.21% vs 8.16% for DDX. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, DDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AOR has performed better with a 14.21% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDX and AOR have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
DDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 2.47% for AOR.
They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and iShares.
DDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDX and AOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer