DDX vs. USAF
DDX (Defined Duration 10 ETF) and USAF (Atlas America Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DDX returned 13.11% vs 4.92% for USAF. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for USAF.
Performance
DDX vs. USAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDX achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly higher than USAF's 1.28% return.
DDX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 13.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USAF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDX vs. USAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 5.64% | 12.02% | -1.03% |
USAF Atlas America Fund | 1.28% | 9.09% | 0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDX and USAF is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDX vs. USAF — Risk / Return Rank
DDX
USAF
DDX vs. USAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) and Atlas America Fund (USAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDX | USAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.16 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 1.11 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 2.45 | +9.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDX vs. USAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDX drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than USAF's maximum drawdown of -4.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDX and USAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDX | USAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -4.46% | -16.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.41% | -4.46% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.17% | +4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -1.16% | -5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 2.01% | -0.91% |
Volatility
DDX vs. USAF - Volatility Comparison
Defined Duration 10 ETF (DDX) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to Atlas America Fund (USAF) at 0.92%. This indicates that DDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDX | USAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 0.92% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.66% | 4.77% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.62% | 5.97% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 5.63% | +1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 5.63% | +1.84% |
DDX vs. USAF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USAF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDX vs. USAF - Dividend Comparison
DDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than USAF's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDX Defined Duration 10 ETF | 3.37% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.41% | 1.38% | 1.14% |
USAF Atlas America Fund | 2.47% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDX and USAF have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDX has higher volatility (1.76%) compared to USAF (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDX dropped -21.27% vs USAF's -4.46%.
On 1-year performance, DDX leads with 13.11% vs 4.92% for USAF. On fees, DDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, USAF has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DDX has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for USAF.
DDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 2.47% for USAF.
They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and Atlas. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDX and 0.89% for USAF.
DDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDX and USAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer