PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DDWM having a 10.94% annualized return and VEA not far behind at 10.72%.


DDWM

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
6.75%
6M
6.95%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
10.94%

VEA

1D
-3.07%
1M
0.11%
YTD
13.11%
6M
12.98%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.75%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.11%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and VEA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.90

The correlation between DDWM and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
VEA

Industrials

21.1%
17.5%

Financial Services

20.7%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
7.4%

Technology

9.0%
16.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
5.5%

Basic Materials

5.5%
7.5%

Communication Services

5.4%
3.2%

Utilities

5.2%
3.0%

Energy

3.7%
4.7%

Real Estate

3.0%
2.5%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
VEA
17.5%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.7%
VEA
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.6%
VEA
7.4%

Technology

DDWM
9.0%
VEA
16.6%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.6%
VEA
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.4%
VEA
5.5%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.5%
VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.4%
VEA
3.2%

Utilities

DDWM
5.2%
VEA
3.0%

Energy

DDWM
3.7%
VEA
4.7%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.0%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDWMVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.62

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

10.06

-3.02

DDWM vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-60.68%

+25.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-11.63%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-13.45%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-29.71%

+14.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-35.73%

+0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-3.07%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-13.26%

+9.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.02%

-0.09%

Volatility

DDWM vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 4.18%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

7.09%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

14.74%

-3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

16.79%

-3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

16.76%

-3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

17.21%

-2.07%

DDWM vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than VEA's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.32%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.58%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and VEA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to DDWM (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, DDWM leads with 10.94% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDWM has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.32% for DDWM.

DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer