PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. RODM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 10.94%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.31% annualized return.


DDWM

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
6.75%
6M
6.95%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
10.94%

RODM

1D
-0.71%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
10.16%
6M
9.75%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.75%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
10.16%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and RODM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.86

The correlation between DDWM and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
RODM

Industrials

21.1%
16.7%

Financial Services

20.7%
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
6.0%

Technology

9.0%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.5%
6.4%

Communication Services

5.4%
5.5%

Utilities

5.2%
4.8%

Energy

3.7%
6.3%

Real Estate

3.0%
3.5%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
RODM
16.7%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.7%
RODM
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.6%
RODM
6.0%

Technology

DDWM
9.0%
RODM
10.5%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.6%
RODM
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.4%
RODM
4.0%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.5%
RODM
6.4%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.4%
RODM
5.5%

Utilities

DDWM
5.2%
RODM
4.8%

Energy

DDWM
3.7%
RODM
6.3%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.0%
RODM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDWMRODMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

3.40

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

13.45

-6.40

DDWM vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, roughly equal to the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and RODM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMRODMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-35.98%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-7.10%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-10.58%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-28.85%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-35.98%

+0.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-2.16%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-6.36%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.79%

+1.14%

Volatility

DDWM vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.21%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMRODMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.21%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

8.77%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

10.95%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

13.45%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

15.08%

+0.06%

DDWM vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than RODM's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.32%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.82%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and RODM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDWM has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to RODM (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs RODM's -35.98%.

On 10-year performance, DDWM leads with 10.94% vs 9.31% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDWM has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 9.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 2.32% for DDWM.

DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.29% for RODM.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and RODM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer