DDWM vs. RODM
DDWM (WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DDWM tracks the WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index while RODM tracks the Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DDWM returned 10.94%/yr vs 9.31%/yr for RODM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDWM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
DDWM vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 10.94%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.31% annualized return.
DDWM
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
RODM
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
DDWM vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund | 6.75% | 30.07% | 10.70% | 15.25% | -0.77% | 14.84% | -4.56% | 21.43% | -11.75% | 18.80% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 10.16% | 34.42% | 8.02% | 15.76% | -14.54% | 11.11% | -0.62% | 17.15% | -9.97% | 25.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDWM and RODM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DDWM and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
DDWM vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDWM
RODM
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
DDWM
RODM
Financial Services
DDWM
RODM
Consumer Cyclical
DDWM
RODM
Technology
DDWM
RODM
Healthcare
DDWM
RODM
Consumer Defensive
DDWM
RODM
Basic Materials
DDWM
RODM
Communication Services
DDWM
RODM
Utilities
DDWM
RODM
Energy
DDWM
RODM
Real Estate
DDWM
RODM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDWM vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
DDWM
RODM
DDWM vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDWM | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.40 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 3.40 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 13.45 | -6.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDWM vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, roughly equal to the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDWM | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.00% | -35.98% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -7.10% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.34% | -10.58% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -28.85% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -35.98% | +0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -2.16% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -6.36% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 1.79% | +1.14% |
Volatility
DDWM vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.21%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDWM | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 3.21% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 8.77% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 10.95% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 13.45% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 15.08% | +0.06% |
DDWM vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDWM vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than RODM's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDWM WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund | 2.32% | 2.47% | 3.57% | 4.46% | 4.28% | 3.73% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 4.40% | 2.65% | 4.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.82% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDWM and RODM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDWM has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to RODM (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs RODM's -35.98%.
On 10-year performance, DDWM leads with 10.94% vs 9.31% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DDWM has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 9.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 2.32% for DDWM.
DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.29% for RODM.
RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDWM and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer