PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 10.94%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.


DDWM

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
6.75%
6M
6.95%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
10.94%

DGRW

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
6.36%
6M
5.72%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.75%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
6.36%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and DGRW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.73

The correlation between DDWM and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
DGRW

Industrials

21.1%
9.9%

Financial Services

20.7%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
7.1%

Technology

9.0%
32.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
6.7%

Basic Materials

5.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

5.4%
10.1%

Utilities

5.2%
0.2%

Energy

3.7%
5.0%

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
DGRW
9.9%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.7%
DGRW
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.6%
DGRW
7.1%

Technology

DDWM
9.0%
DGRW
32.1%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.6%
DGRW
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.4%
DGRW
6.7%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.5%
DGRW
3.3%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.4%
DGRW
10.1%

Utilities

DDWM
5.2%
DGRW
0.2%

Energy

DDWM
3.7%
DGRW
5.0%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.0%
DGRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDWMDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.04

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

8.67

-1.62

DDWM vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-32.04%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-8.30%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-16.21%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-17.27%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-32.04%

-2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-3.32%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-3.01%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.95%

+0.98%

Volatility

DDWM vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.75%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.75%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

8.26%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

10.30%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

14.01%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

16.21%

-1.07%

DDWM vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than DGRW's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.32%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.30%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and DGRW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDWM has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to DGRW (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.14% vs 10.94% for DDWM. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.14% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.30% for DGRW.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer