DDTM vs. UXJL
DDTM (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. DDTM is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DDTM charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
DDTM vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDTM
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTM vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDTM Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March | 3.70% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 8.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTM and UXJL is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTM vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March (DDTM) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTM vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTM drawdown since its inception was -5.20%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTM and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTM | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -10.29% | +5.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -3.71% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -1.58% | +0.61% |
Volatility
DDTM vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTM | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.30% | 14.58% | -6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 14.58% | -6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 14.58% | -6.28% |
DDTM vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTM vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTM nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DDTM and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, DDTM is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTM is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
DDTM and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTM and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for DDTM and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer