DDTM vs. CPSP

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

DDTM (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March) and CPSP (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTM is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while CPSP is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Calamos. DDTM is passively managed, while CPSP is actively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DDTM charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSP.

Performance

DDTM vs. CPSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March (DDTM) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDTM

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 1.64%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CPSP

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 3.42%
• YTD: 3.93%
• 1Y: 6.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	$54.58K	$124.03K	$65.43K
DDTM Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March	$16.94K	$11.74K	$17.70K

DDTM vs. CPSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDTM Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March	6.14%
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTM and CPSP is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2026	0.79

Return for Risk

DDTM vs. CPSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDTM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CPSP

CPSP Risk / Return Rank: 98
CPSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CPSP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDTM vs. CPSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March (DDTM) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDTM	CPSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	8.37	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	17.11	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	65.90	—

Drawdowns

DDTM vs. CPSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTM drawdown since its inception was -5.20%, which is greater than CPSP's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTM and CPSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTM	CPSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-1.73%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-0.09%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDTM	CPSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.59%	1.40%	+6.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.59%	2.32%	+5.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.59%	2.32%	+5.27%

DDTM vs. CPSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSP's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDTM vs. CPSP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTM nor CPSP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTM and CPSP in my portfolio?

DDTM and CPSP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDTM or CPSP?

On fees, CPSP is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTM or CPSP?

CPSP is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTM or CPSP?

DDTM and CPSP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDTM and CPSP?

DDTM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CPSP is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTM and 0.69% for CPSP.