DDTM vs. SFLR
DDTM (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTM is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. DDTM is passively managed, while SFLR is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DDTM charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
DDTM vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDTM
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 13.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.94K | $11.74K | $17.70K | |
| $7.39M | $8.55M | $12.95M |
DDTM vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDTM Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March | 6.14% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTM and SFLR is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2026 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTM vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
DDTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SFLR
DDTM vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March (DDTM) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDTM | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTM vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTM drawdown since its inception was -5.20%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTM and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTM | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -12.13% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.40% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -1.74% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.82% | — |
Volatility
DDTM vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTM | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.59% | 9.91% | -2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 10.28% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 10.28% | -2.69% |
DDTM vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTM vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
DDTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDTM Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.28% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTM and SFLR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDTM is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTM is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for DDTM.
DDTM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTM and 0.89% for SFLR.
Find the right allocation for DDTM and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer