PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTM vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTM vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March (DDTM) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTM

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.04%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-2.46%
1M
14.15%
YTD
18.85%
6M
29.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTM vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTM and NVDO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTM vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - March (DDTM) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTM vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTMNVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.36

1.30

+1.05

Drawdowns

DDTM vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTM drawdown since its inception was -4.73%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTM and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTMNVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-16.25%

+11.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-2.68%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-4.99%

+4.15%

Volatility

DDTM vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTMNVDODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.40%

31.93%

-23.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.40%

31.93%

-23.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.40%

31.93%

-23.53%

DDTM vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTM vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

DDTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDTM and NVDO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTM.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for DDTM.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTM and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTM and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer