DDTL vs. QFLR
DDTL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by Innovator, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDTL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.
Performance
DDTL vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTL achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's 6.90% return.
DDTL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QFLR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 6M
- 5.88%
- 1Y
- 26.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTL vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 4.57% | 6.48% |
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | 6.90% | 15.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTL and QFLR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTL vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank
DDTL
QFLR
DDTL vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDTL | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.27 | 1.40 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
DDTL vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTL drawdown since its inception was -3.78%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTL and QFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTL | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -13.97% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.48% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -2.50% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.78% | — |
Volatility
DDTL vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTL | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.46% | 11.28% | -5.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 12.62% | -7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 12.62% | -7.16% |
DDTL vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTL vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTL nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTL and QFLR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDTL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.
DDTL and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DDTL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTL and 0.89% for QFLR.
Find the right allocation for DDTL and QFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer