DDTJ vs. QB
DDTJ (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. DDTJ is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDTJ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.
Performance
DDTJ vs. QB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDTJ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QB
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTJ vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDTJ Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January | 4.65% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 6.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTJ and QB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.79 |
DDTJ vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDTJ
QB
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DDTJ
QB
Financial Services
DDTJ
QB
Communication Services
DDTJ
QB
Consumer Cyclical
DDTJ
QB
Healthcare
DDTJ
QB
Industrials
DDTJ
QB
Consumer Defensive
DDTJ
QB
Energy
DDTJ
QB
Utilities
DDTJ
QB
Real Estate
DDTJ
QB
Basic Materials
DDTJ
QB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTJ vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDTJ | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 2.15 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
DDTJ vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTJ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTJ and QB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTJ | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -3.47% | -1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -3.47% | +2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.83% | -0.36% | -0.47% |
Volatility
DDTJ vs. QB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTJ | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.99% | 6.54% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.99% | 6.54% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.99% | 6.54% | +1.45% |
DDTJ vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTJ vs. QB - Dividend Comparison
DDTJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DDTJ Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.64% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTJ and QB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTJ.
QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for DDTJ.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTJ and 0.58% for QB.
Find the right allocation for DDTJ and QB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer