PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTJ vs. MMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTJ vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTJ

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.11%
YTD
2.86%
6M
3.44%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTJ vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTJ and MMAX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTJ vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTJ

MMAX
MMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTJ vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTJ vs. MMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTJMMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

3.02

-1.59

Drawdowns

DDTJ vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTJ drawdown since its inception was -5.15%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTJ and MMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTJMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-1.93%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.35%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-0.10%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

Volatility

DDTJ vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTJMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.99%

1.42%

+6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.99%

2.50%

+5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.99%

2.50%

+5.49%

DDTJ vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTJ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTJ vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison

DDTJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDTJ and MMAX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTJ.

MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for DDTJ.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTJ and 0.50% for MMAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTJ and MMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer