PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTF vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTF vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTF

1D
-1.26%
1M
0.23%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
19.04%
6M
15.93%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTF vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTF and RSBY is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

-0.54

DDTF vs. RSBY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDTF
RSBY

Technology

36.2%
53.7%

Financial Services

11.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.9%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.2%

Healthcare

8.4%
4.2%

Industrials

8.1%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.7%

Energy

3.5%
0.6%

Utilities

2.3%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

DDTF
36.2%
RSBY
53.7%

Financial Services

DDTF
11.9%
RSBY
0.2%

Communication Services

DDTF
10.9%
RSBY
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DDTF
10.1%
RSBY
12.2%

Healthcare

DDTF
8.4%
RSBY
4.2%

Industrials

DDTF
8.1%
RSBY
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDTF
4.9%
RSBY
7.7%

Energy

DDTF
3.5%
RSBY
0.6%

Utilities

DDTF
2.3%
RSBY
1.4%

Real Estate

DDTF
1.9%
RSBY
0.1%

Basic Materials

DDTF
1.8%
RSBY
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTF vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTF

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTF vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTF vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTFRSBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

-0.19

+1.34

Drawdowns

DDTF vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTFRSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-23.32%

+17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-6.04%

+4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.03%

-13.76%

+12.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

Volatility

DDTF vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTFRSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

11.78%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.91%

13.53%

-4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.91%

13.53%

-4.62%

DDTF vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTF vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

DDTF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDTF and RSBY have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDTF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDTF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for DDTF.

DDTF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTF and 0.98% for RSBY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTF and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer