PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTF vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTF vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTF

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.28%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTF vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTF and BUFF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.93

DDTF vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDTF
BUFF

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

DDTF
36.2%
BUFF
36.2%

Financial Services

DDTF
11.9%
BUFF
11.9%

Communication Services

DDTF
10.9%
BUFF
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DDTF
10.1%
BUFF
10.1%

Healthcare

DDTF
8.4%
BUFF
8.4%

Industrials

DDTF
8.1%
BUFF
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDTF
4.9%
BUFF
4.9%

Energy

DDTF
3.5%
BUFF
3.5%

Utilities

DDTF
2.3%
BUFF
2.3%

Real Estate

DDTF
1.9%
BUFF
1.9%

Basic Materials

DDTF
1.8%
BUFF
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTF vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTF

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTF vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTF vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTFBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.49

+1.12

Drawdowns

DDTF vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTFBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-46.23%

+40.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.27%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-6.18%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

Volatility

DDTF vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTFBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

5.15%

+3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.72%

8.41%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.72%

17.67%

-8.95%

DDTF vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTF vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTF nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
DDTF
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DDTF and BUFF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, DDTF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDTF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

DDTF and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTF and 0.89% for BUFF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTF and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer