DDTF vs. FBUF
DDTF (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDTF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.
Performance
DDTF vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDTF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBUF
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTF vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDTF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February | 4.45% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTF and FBUF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTF vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank
DDTF
FBUF
DDTF vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDTF | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 1.47 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
DDTF vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and FBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTF | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -11.09% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.22% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -1.38% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.25% | — |
Volatility
DDTF vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTF | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.72% | 7.49% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.72% | 9.55% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.72% | 9.55% | -0.83% |
DDTF vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTF vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison
DDTF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDTF Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.63% | 0.64% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DDTF and FBUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTF.
FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for DDTF.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTF and 0.48% for FBUF.
Find the right allocation for DDTF and FBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer