PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTF vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTF vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDTF

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.28%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBUF

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.85%
YTD
5.32%
6M
6.28%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTF vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTF and FBUF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTF vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTF

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTF vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - February (DDTF) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDTF vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDTFFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

1.47

+0.14

Drawdowns

DDTF vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTF drawdown since its inception was -5.42%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTF and FBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTFFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-11.09%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.22%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-1.38%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

Volatility

DDTF vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTFFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

7.49%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.72%

9.55%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.72%

9.55%

-0.83%

DDTF vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDTF vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

DDTF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DDTF and FBUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTF.

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for DDTF.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTF and 0.48% for FBUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTF and FBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer