DDTD vs. QFLR

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

DDTD (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - December) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTD is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. DDTD is passively managed, while QFLR is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDTD charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

DDTD vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - December (DDTD) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DDTD having a 6.24% return and QFLR slightly higher at 6.42%.

DDTD

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 6.24%
• 6M: 5.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -0.65%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.92%
• 1Y: 22.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTD vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDTD Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - December	6.24%	0.94%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	6.42%	-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTD and QFLR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

DDTD vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 64
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTD vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - December (DDTD) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDTD	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.72	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.94	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.32	—

Drawdowns

DDTD vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTD drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTD and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTD	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-13.97%	+8.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.92%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.72%	-2.51%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDTD	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.23%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.53%	13.02%	-5.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.53%	13.20%	-5.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.53%	13.20%	-5.67%

DDTD vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTD has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDTD vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTD nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DDTD Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTD and QFLR in my portfolio?

DDTD and QFLR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDTD or QFLR?

On fees, DDTD is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTD or QFLR?

DDTD is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTD or QFLR?

DDTD and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDTD and QFLR?

DDTD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTD and 0.89% for QFLR.