DDM vs. SQQQ
DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - DDM tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DDM returned 20.48%/yr vs -56.24%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DDM vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DDM has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 20.48%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.24% annualized return.
DDM
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 41.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 20.48%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 9.83%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -40.31%
- 6M
- -37.80%
- 1Y
- -61.11%
- 3Y*
- -53.86%
- 5Y*
- -46.89%
- 10Y*
- -56.24%
DDM vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 13.14% | 20.59% | 21.60% | 24.34% | -19.48% | 41.97% | 2.14% | 47.98% | -13.46% | 59.56% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.31% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDM and SQQQ is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.75 |
The correlation between DDM and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.75 (all time) to -0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DDM vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDM
SQQQ
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DDM
SQQQ
Industrials
DDM
SQQQ
-
Technology
DDM
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
DDM
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
DDM
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
DDM
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
DDM
SQQQ
-
Energy
DDM
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
DDM
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
DDM
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
DDM
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDM vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
DDM
SQQQ
DDM vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.78 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | -0.96 | +3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | -1.81 | +9.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDM vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.70% | -100.00% | +18.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.31% | -63.52% | +44.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -92.51% | +60.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.18% | -97.27% | +57.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.13% | -99.98% | +36.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -100.00% | +98.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -92.73% | +75.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.26% | 36.37% | -31.11% |
Volatility
DDM vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) is 8.37%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.69%. This indicates that DDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 26.69% | -18.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 43.33% | -23.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.90% | 53.65% | -28.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 67.53% | -37.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.76% | 66.47% | -31.71% |
DDM vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DDM and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DDM vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SQQQ's 11.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.44% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDM and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.69%) compared to DDM (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, DDM leads with 20.48% vs -56.24% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DDM has been the lower-risk option at 8.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DDM has performed better with a 20.48% return vs -56.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDM and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.44%, compared with 0.88% for DDM.
DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
DDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDM and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer