PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than HSCZ's 10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, DDLS has underperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 9.73%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.


DDLS

1D
-0.85%
1M
2.35%
YTD
5.70%
6M
8.32%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
9.73%

HSCZ

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.13%
YTD
10.57%
6M
13.25%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDLS vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
5.70%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.57%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and HSCZ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2016

0.83

The correlation between DDLS and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDLS vs. HSCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDLS
HSCZ

Industrials

25.1%
23.3%

Financial Services

12.9%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
8.1%

Basic Materials

8.0%
13.7%

Technology

7.8%
9.8%

Real Estate

6.3%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
2.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.5%

Energy

3.2%
4.1%

Healthcare

2.7%
3.3%

Utilities

2.0%
3.5%

Industrials

DDLS
25.1%
HSCZ
23.3%

Financial Services

DDLS
12.9%
HSCZ
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DDLS
11.2%
HSCZ
8.1%

Basic Materials

DDLS
8.0%
HSCZ
13.7%

Technology

DDLS
7.8%
HSCZ
9.8%

Real Estate

DDLS
6.3%
HSCZ
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

DDLS
5.9%
HSCZ
2.9%

Communication Services

DDLS
3.7%
HSCZ
3.5%

Energy

DDLS
3.2%
HSCZ
4.1%

Healthcare

DDLS
2.7%
HSCZ
3.3%

Utilities

DDLS
2.0%
HSCZ
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDLS vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDLSHSCZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

2.57

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

3.63

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.99

-0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.89

12.84

-4.95

DDLS vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDLSHSCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.57

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.82

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.74

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.67

-0.03

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than HSCZ's maximum drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-34.89%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-9.61%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-12.81%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-20.11%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-34.89%

-1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-0.98%

-2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-4.65%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.23%

+0.62%

Volatility

DDLS vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 3.44%. This indicates that DDLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

3.44%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

9.20%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

11.21%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

13.46%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

15.66%

-0.07%

DDLS vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDLS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDLS vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than HSCZ's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.54%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.94%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDLS has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to HSCZ (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

On 10-year performance, HSCZ leads with 11.62% vs 9.73% for DDLS. On fees, HSCZ is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 11.62% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HSCZ is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 2.94% for HSCZ.

DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index, while HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DDLS and 0.43% for HSCZ.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer