PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DDLS has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 10.19%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.


DDLS

1D
0.15%
1M
0.68%
YTD
6.60%
6M
8.68%
1Y
22.28%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.19%

FNDF

1D
0.39%
1M
2.91%
YTD
19.66%
6M
21.60%
1Y
41.60%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDLS vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
6.60%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
19.66%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and FNDF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016

0.80

The correlation between DDLS and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDLS vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDLS
FNDF

Industrials

25.1%
15.5%

Financial Services

12.9%
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
10.8%

Basic Materials

8.0%
11.3%

Technology

7.8%
14.4%

Real Estate

6.3%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
6.5%

Communication Services

3.7%
4.9%

Energy

3.2%
10.9%

Healthcare

2.7%
5.2%

Utilities

2.0%
3.5%

Industrials

DDLS
25.1%
FNDF
15.5%

Financial Services

DDLS
12.9%
FNDF
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DDLS
11.2%
FNDF
10.8%

Basic Materials

DDLS
8.0%
FNDF
11.3%

Technology

DDLS
7.8%
FNDF
14.4%

Real Estate

DDLS
6.3%
FNDF
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

DDLS
5.9%
FNDF
6.5%

Communication Services

DDLS
3.7%
FNDF
4.9%

Energy

DDLS
3.2%
FNDF
10.9%

Healthcare

DDLS
2.7%
FNDF
5.2%

Utilities

DDLS
2.0%
FNDF
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDLS vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDLSFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.82

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.42

14.27

-6.84

DDLS vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-40.14%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-10.60%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-13.89%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-25.56%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-40.14%

+3.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-1.94%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-7.63%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.84%

+0.08%

Volatility

DDLS vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) is 4.55%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that DDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

6.65%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

13.64%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

16.00%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

16.35%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

17.71%

-2.11%

DDLS vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDLS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDLS vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than FNDF's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.52%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.87%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and FNDF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to DDLS (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 12.34% vs 10.19% for DDLS. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.87% for FNDF.

DDLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DDLS and 0.25% for FNDF.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer