DDIV vs. TBG
DDIV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF) and TBG (TBG Dividend Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDIV is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while TBG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by EA Series Trust. DDIV is passively managed, while TBG is actively managed. Over the past year, DDIV returned 22.70% vs 20.60% for TBG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDIV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TBG.
Performance
DDIV vs. TBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than TBG's 11.74% return.
DDIV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 22.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
TBG
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDIV vs. TBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DDIV First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF | 8.57% | 12.23% | 27.18% | 11.53% |
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF | 11.74% | 7.50% | 20.58% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDIV and TBG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.77 |
The correlation between DDIV and TBG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
DDIV vs. TBG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDIV
TBG
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
DDIV
TBG
Financial Services
DDIV
TBG
Real Estate
DDIV
TBG
Consumer Defensive
DDIV
TBG
Industrials
DDIV
TBG
Consumer Cyclical
DDIV
TBG
Utilities
DDIV
TBG
Healthcare
DDIV
TBG
Basic Materials
DDIV
TBG
Communication Services
DDIV
TBG
Technology
DDIV
TBG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDIV vs. TBG — Risk / Return Rank
DDIV
TBG
DDIV vs. TBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDIV | TBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.37 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | 10.43 | -3.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDIV | TBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.16 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.62 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
DDIV vs. TBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, which is greater than TBG's maximum drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and TBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDIV | TBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.56% | -14.76% | -32.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -6.13% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.49% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -2.10% | -3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.98% | +1.09% |
Volatility
DDIV vs. TBG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) is 2.65%, while TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that DDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDIV | TBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 2.83% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 6.72% | +5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 9.59% | +4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 12.23% | +6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 12.23% | +7.67% |
DDIV vs. TBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TBG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDIV vs. TBG - Dividend Comparison
DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than TBG's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDIV First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF | 1.59% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.60% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.93% | 3.27% |
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF | 2.66% | 2.80% | 2.33% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDIV and TBG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBG has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to DDIV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs TBG's -14.76%.
On 1-year performance, DDIV leads with 22.70% vs 20.60% for TBG. On fees, TBG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, DDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DDIV has performed better with a 22.70% return vs 20.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DDIV.
TBG has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.59% for DDIV.
DDIV is categorized as Momentum, while TBG is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and EA Series Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DDIV and 0.59% for TBG.
TBG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDIV and TBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer