PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFS vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFS vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September (DDFS) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDFS achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.


DDFS

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.83%
YTD
3.40%
6M
4.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QB

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFS vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFS and QB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFS vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September (DDFS) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDFS vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFSQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.26

3.17

-0.91

Drawdowns

DDFS vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFS drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFS and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFSQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-1.83%

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.30%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-0.34%

+0.03%

Volatility

DDFS vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFSQBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

5.75%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.07%

5.75%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.07%

5.75%

-1.68%

DDFS vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFS vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

DDFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDFS and QB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFS.

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for DDFS.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFS and 0.58% for QB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFS and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer