DDFS vs. EAPR
DDFS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. DDFS is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.
Performance
DDFS vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFS achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 9.33% return.
DDFS
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAPR
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DDFS vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September | 3.49% | 3.42% |
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April | 9.33% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFS and EAPR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFS vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank
DDFS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EAPR
DDFS vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September (DDFS) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFS | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.57 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 25.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFS vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFS drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFS and EAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFS | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -17.65% | +15.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -2.64% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -4.04% | +3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.72% | — |
Volatility
DDFS vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFS | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99% | 8.68% | -4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 10.33% | -6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 10.21% | -6.22% |
DDFS vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFS vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFS nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFS and EAPR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.
DDFS and EAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFS and 0.89% for EAPR.
Find the right allocation for DDFS and EAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer