DDFO vs. USL
DDFO (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFO is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. DDFO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
DDFO vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFO achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 39.91% return.
DDFO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -8.34%
- 6M
- 37.03%
- YTD
- 39.91%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
DDFO vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFO Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October | 4.46% | 1.91% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 39.91% | -6.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFO and USL is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFO vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
DDFO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USL
DDFO vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October (DDFO) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFO | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFO vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFO drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFO and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFO | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -89.06% | +86.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -46.94% | +46.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -61.36% | +60.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.73% | — |
Volatility
DDFO vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFO | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53% | 28.79% | -24.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 30.31% | -25.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 32.30% | -27.77% |
DDFO vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFO vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFO nor USL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFO and USL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFO is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFO is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
DDFO and USL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DDFO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USL is Oil & Gas. DDFO tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFO and 0.88% for USL.
Find the right allocation for DDFO and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer