PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFO vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFO vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October (DDFO) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDFO achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 80.79% return.


DDFO

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.25%
YTD
3.31%
6M
3.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
-2.44%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
80.79%
6M
73.97%
1Y
82.92%
3Y*
25.89%
5Y*
22.87%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFO vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFO and BNO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFO vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFO

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFO vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - October (DDFO) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDFO vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFOBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

0.13

+1.50

Drawdowns

DDFO vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFO drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFO and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFOBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-87.06%

+84.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-14.85%

+14.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-40.16%

+39.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.53%

Volatility

DDFO vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFOBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

41.63%

-36.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

35.41%

-30.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

36.69%

-31.99%

DDFO vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFO vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFO nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDFO and BNO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDFO is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDFO is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

DDFO and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DDFO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. DDFO tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFO and 0.90% for BNO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFO and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer